[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FTPSERVER-144?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Olivier Lourdais closed FTPSERVER-144.
--------------------------------------
> User manager properties file
> ----------------------------
>
> Key: FTPSERVER-144
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FTPSERVER-144
> Project: FtpServer
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Core
> Affects Versions: 1.0-M2
> Reporter: Olivier Lourdais
> Assignee: Niklas Gustavsson
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 1.0-M3
>
>
> We use Apache FTP Server embedded in an application (to allow some devices to
> download firmware updates).
> We would like this application let less files as possible on the user
> computer. Or at least, only files whose names are prefixed by the application
> name.
> The current version of our application uses an old code base of Apache FTP
> Server. Through a properties-based configuration, it sets
> "config.user-manager.prop-file" and "config.ip-restrictor.file" properties to
> use appropriate file names, in the current directory rather than in "./res".
> With this configuration, we create a ConfigurableFtpServerContext object,
> then the FtpServer object.
> And it works well.
> For a future version of our application, we would like to keep synchronized
> on Apache FTP Server trunk (at least until 1.0 version :-) ).
> So I wrote a Spring configuration file to get the same behavior:
> <file-user-manager file="./EquipmentSetup-ftp-users.properties"
> encrypt-passwords="true" />
> The problem is that the configure() and createDefaultUsers() of the
> PropertiesUserManager object are called (by DefaultFtpServerContext
> constructor) *before* Spring sets the "file" value, so the "res" directory is
> still created, with a "user.gen" file whose content is irrelevant for our
> application.
> Thus, I would like to know if there is a way, using Spring, to bypass this
> behavior.
> Just in case, I tried to use a <user-manager><beans:bean
> class="org.apache.ftpserver.usermanager.PropertiesUserManager"/></user-manager>
> instead of <file-user-manager/>, but with the same result...
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.