On Thu, 14 Aug 2008 00:31:17 +0000 (GMT) Edouard De Oliveira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, the author tags have been fixed but i have now some questions > about licensing : o.a.m.proxy.utils.StringUtilities.java & > o.a.m.proxy.handlers.http.digest.DigestUtilities.java have been > written by using some code borrowed from Mailster which is a project > that i develop alone using a GPL 2.0. I did include a note about this > on the header but it may not be the best way and seems not to comply > with MINA project rules. What is the best way for me to grant license > to mina for these small pieces of code ? (Of course, I'd like not to > have to change the whole license of my own project ) For the > o.a.m.proxy.handlers.http.ntlm.NTLMResponses.java, i added a comment > on the header explaining that i used the following > http://curl.haxx.se/rfc/ntlm.html has a reference for my > implementation and that most of the code of NTLMResponses.java is > taken from this url (this represents less than 20% of the NTLM code) > Is this the best way to do so ? Should i contact the author to ask > him to allow asf to use his code ? Those licenses questions grrr ... > necessary burden i know :) Cordialement, Regards, -Edouard De > Oliveira- http://tedorg.free.fr/en/main.php > > Hi, If you are the copyright older, it's not a problem cause the CLA cover that, the best is probably to add nothing to the header. For the example, I have no clue, I would think since there is no copyright licence, we need the author agreement and the best is to ask in the legal mailing list how to procede. Julien PS : you know your yahoo web mail is a PITA it's breaking mail threads id ?
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
