Niklas Gustavsson wrote:
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 4:13 PM, Mark Webb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think we should focus on getting 2.0 out the door. We have been
working on it long enough and I think there are many people using it
in production or near-production systems. Once we release, we will
probably get alot more feedback and can use that feedback to
enhance/fix the next version.
Big +1. We will find areas that we would like to improve during the
foreseeable future (this change and ByteBuffer comes to mind).
yop. And I don't see how we can include that in 2 weeks...
Including all such changes will delay 2.0 for a long time, long enough
for MINA to get behind other frameworks. Having a real release out
will mean getting further feedback from users, so far I haven't seen a
lot of users requesting this change nor the ByteBuffer change. I think
we're too critical, the code is great.
Well, IMHO, the code works. Saying that it's great is another story :)
(but this might just be a matter of taste ...)
Anyway, I agree with what you say. We don't release fast enough. Atm,
regardless to the current code quality, and performance, I think MINA 2
is usable, even if there are still some issues to fix. I will do some
quick perf tests on ADS with MINA 2 and give you some feedback soon.
Release early, release often.
We do neither.
eh ;)
I would think that we should move right
towards 3.0.
I say go work on a branch (as already suggested) and see where that leads.
There is a new branche for such experiment. Branching is certainly the
way to go, whatever we do regarding the release !
I would like to let this thread go for a little bit (let's say a couple
of days), and then, I think we will have to vote : going for 2.0-RC or
modify the code massively.
--
--
cordialement, regards,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
directory.apache.org
