Thanks! it a bit clear now. Let me experiment with it.

On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 7:00 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Ashish,
>
> Ashish wrote:
>>
>> The documentation says
>>
>> **
>> Invoked when any exception is thrown by user [EMAIL PROTECTED] IoHandler}
>> implementation or by MINA.  If <code>cause</code> is an instance of
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] IOException}, MINA will close the connection automatically
>>
>> **
>>
>> The fact that I am trying to understand here is about Exception
>> handling strategy in MINA while decoding protocol specific bytes
>> and there are violations in packet structure.
>>
>> Will exceptionCaught() be called if Protocol Decoder throws an
>> exception or it shall handle only. IoHandler's are typically meant to
>> handle business logic.
>> So if there is an error while decoding an error,
>> 1. Is it okay to throw an error from the decoder and process it in
>> exceptionCaught().
>>
>> Are there other scenarios where this function can be used
>>
>
> I must say that this is an area where the semantic of the ExceptionCaught
> message is everything but clear. It needs to be clarified in 3.0, for sure.
>
> Obviously, an error while decoding a message could lead to the session
> closing, but this should be optional (ie, it's up to the application to
> decide what to do).
>
> In any case, the exceptionCaught message is just generate to allow all the
> filters (and the handler) to clean what need to be cleaned, as the exception
> will not be caaught by the filters (unless someone want to modify the
> existing filters ...), so this is the only way to propagate the exception
> correctly.
>
>
> --
> --
> cordialement, regards,
> Emmanuel Lécharny
> www.iktek.com
> directory.apache.org
>
>
>



-- 
thanks
ashish

Blog: http://www.ashishpaliwal.com/blog

My Photo Galleries: http://www.pbase.com/ashishpaliwal

Reply via email to