Hi,
I'm not sure knowing the MINA architecture helps for using it. I think
documenting interfaces and providing tutorials is much more important.
We should try to provide good internal & architecture for 3.0, because
actually there is too much over complexified areas.

Julien

Le Mon, 26 Jan 2009 13:40:49 +0530,
Ashish <[email protected]> a écrit :

> BY mistake, clicked send without the text.
> 
> I would say, Overall MINA Architecture details is of prime importance
> now.
> 
> WDYT?
> 
> On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 5:37 PM, Julien Vermillard
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > Looks like we are near to RC1, mostly doc issues remaining :
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA/fixforversion/12313160
> > For me the most important are :
> >  - reqres filter which is totally javadocless
> >  - documentation on how to setup and use APR transport (I'll do it)
> >  - update website (Ashish is doing a great job here)
> >
> > Do you see any other important issues ?
> > I think it would be nice if we can have a GA or an RC of MINA2 for
> > Apachecon EU.
> >
> > Julien
> >
> 
> 
> 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to