On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 9:12 AM, Ashish <[email protected]> wrote: > We have couple of Discussion pages > > LoggingFilter discussion > MdcInjectionFilter discussion > NoopFilter discussion > ProfilerTimerFilter discussion > ProtocolCodec discussion > > From the content they are being used for discussing the implementation > proposals.
I created those pages back in september, while I was trying to 'reverse-engineer' these filters. They were supposed to describe what the filters are doing, and eventually propose improvement. > Few things > > 1. Should we create JIRA issues for such things and track from there. > As of now we may miss them I don't know... I guess that we need a page per filter, assuming that this page describes what the filter does, not discussing about what it should do ... > 2. The current page locations in the hierarchy is misleading. They > should be somewhere under > Roadmap -> IoFilter-> ...... . or it can be something else. The > idea is to have the reader easy to find > what all changes are being discussed and increase User's > participation there. When it comes to making a choice, I think that the ML is the best place. Naming those pages 'Discussion' was an error. I suggest we get rid of all the useless part of those pages, just keeping what is important from the user POV. They should enter into the 'User Guide' category... -- Regards, Cordialement, Emmanuel Lécharny www.iktek.com
