That's a good old debate...
Does de codec is part of the project (ADS, Asyncweb, ...) or can be
placed in some MINA's common codec.
Well, it doesn't matter to much. In my mind, the idea is to design
codec, and then project can decide to use them, or not. But for those
who start a new project using one of the existing codec (for instance,
we see many people wanting to write a XMPP server), then it can help
them. The very same thing for HTTP.
Now, I don't want to strip codecs out of asyncweb, or ADS. It's just the
people from the project to decide whether they want to use the
available codec, or not. A big mistake was done with Asyncweb I think,
and we should not repeat the same pattern...
I think as soon we redo the codec architecture for use only streams &
ByteBuffer, we can restart the debate :)
yup. I just want to drop ideas while they are still in my head...
Julien
--
--
cordialement, regards,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
directory.apache.org
