David Latorre wrote: > So unless someone has a strong reason to need uniform EOLs > > corresponding to the target system, then we might assume that the > > issue with different clients resulting in different files can be > > ignored, and transform only the canonical line ending.
My understanding of the spec has always been that in ASCII mode, both sides must convert between the local OS specific line endings and the canonical CR/LF pairing. If the file isn't in the correct format for the local OS, then the right results cannot be guaranteed. So I would agree that we should only transform to/from the canonical line ending.
