[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-612?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12722755#action_12722755
]
Emmanuel Lecharny commented on DIRMINA-612:
-------------------------------------------
Well, it's a bit too late to change its name. What about adding a warning in
both classes' header about the relation between those two classes ?
Now, considering the content (?) of these classes, the question is : what are
they good for ? There is *no* logic inside them...
I suspect this package (multiton) to be a draft to push some idea about adding
the multiton concept into MINA. I don't really see how good it can be to have
such a construct in MINA? and it sounds like over-engineering to me.
I would vote for adding a @deprecated to all those classes...
> Add documentation on SingleSessionIohandler
> -------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DIRMINA-612
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-612
> Project: MINA
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: Handler
> Affects Versions: 2.0.0-M2
> Reporter: Geert Schuring
> Assignee: Edouard De Oliveira
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 2.0.0-M7
>
> Original Estimate: 1h
> Remaining Estimate: 1h
>
> A normal multi-session IoHandler can be added to the acceptor using the
> "addHandler" method. However, when writing a single-session IoHandler I can't
> find any information about how to register it with the acceptor. The
> "addHandler" method doesn't accept single-session IoHandlers.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
