Hi! On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 22:59, Bernd Fondermann<[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 13:48, Michael Jakl<[email protected]> wrote: >> Since the clients run under the same hood, checking whether a message >> arrives within a certain amount of time should be easy. With more than >> one client-implementation the chances are high that we catch >> interoperability bugs earlier. > > +1 for the general idea. -0 for doing this. Vysper is about a spec > conforming server implementation, not about clients. > If there are clients with interop problems, well, just fix *them* > first (but let's still be liberal in what the server accepts, within > the scope of the spec). > If the server has a problem, write a test for that.
"Interoperability bug" was not exactly the correct wording. The goal was to identify server bugs by using "proven" clients. I'm also -0 for doing this right now, but it seems like a cheap way for doing spec-conformance tests (if there are no better ways). Michael
