Ashish wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 2:00 PM, Bernd Fondermann<[email protected]> 
> wrote:
>> Ashish wrote:
>>> Couple of observations [May not be related to this commit]
>>> 1. Related to spec compliance use - The current implementation has
>>> same element nested within
>>>
>>> @SpecCompliance(compliant = {
>>>         @SpecCompliant(spec = "RFC3921bis-05", section = "3.1.5",
>>> status = IN_PROGRESS, comment = "...."),
>>>         @SpecCompliant(spec = "RFC3921bis-08", section = "3.1.5",
>>> status = NOT_STARTED, comment = "....")
>>>     })
>>>
>>> Not sure about the possibility, but if we can specify them
>>> individually (something like @param in javadoc), would be better. I am
>>> yet to explore the possibility
>>>
>>> Something like
>>> @SpecCompliant(spec = "RFC3921bis-05", section = "3.1.5", status =
>>> IN_PROGRESS, comment = "...."),
>>> @SpecCompliant(spec = "RFC3921bis-08", section = "3.1.5", status =
>>> NOT_STARTED, comment = "....")
>>>
>>> I am not sure if it allowed by JSR 308. If not we can live with this.
>> Agreed, but it's not possible. That's the reason why we had to add
>> @SpecCompliance.
> 
> :-(
> 
>>> 2. We should separate static imports from normal imports. Makes it more 
>>> readable
>>>
>>> like
>>>
>>> import java....
>>> ...// all normal imports
>>> import static ...
>>> ...// all static imports
>>>
>> Wouldn't it be more straightforward the other way round?
> 
> either ways is fine. They just need to be together :-)

I tried to tell it to my IDE, but it seems agnostic about static vs.
non-static imports :-(

> 
>>  import static ...
>>  ...// all static imports
>>  import java....
>>  ...// all normal imports
>>
>>> 3. Max line length is way higher than normal 80 chars, mostly above
>>> 120 chars. For most of MINA code, the limit has been followed.
>> I committed a fix. Better now?
>>
>> Today, my screen has way more columns than lines.
>> That's why I personally prefer longer lines. 80 chars looks way to
>> narrow for me since sitting in front of those large displays.
> 
> Agree, instead of 80, we can have 120, but definitely not 200
> Though, i hate to follow this in a form which actually breaks readability.
> My only concern here is uniformity, if everyone is ok with this we can follow
> this, but we have to do this as a community :-)

Sure, please keep reminding me about it!
Readable code is everything.

  Bernd

Reply via email to