On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 10:08, Bernd Fondermann<[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 20:57, Michael Jakl<[email protected]> wrote: >> On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 16:25, Niklas Gustavsson<[email protected]> wrote: >> How shall we cope with the special smack libs? It seems that the >> required smack lib is from the development branch. > > Why would we use this library, anyway? > For the simple client, with no node configuration etc happening, > self-crafted stanzas would be totally sufficient.
I think a demo with "off the shelf" components would be more "trustworthy" than with hand-crafted stanzas. Since we had some issues with the lib this is still an option. Michael
