Hi! On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 22:35, Niklas Gustavsson<[email protected]> wrote: > In the MUC XEP, implementations should also support the old groupchat > protocol. This was defined before the extension-based-on-namespaces > approach was invented and thus use regular stanzas without namespaces, > for example: > Enter a room: > <presence > from='[email protected]/pda' > to='[email protected]/thirdwitch'/> > > "[email protected]" in the example is a room in the group chat. > > What would be the best way to route such messages to the appropriate > handler? Maybe component support will handle this by being able to > replace the default presence handler completely?
Routing via subdomain seems to be the only viable alternative. Only broadcasting to all modules might work too, but doesn't sound as clean. I don't know whether it's a good idea to register modules with a specific "to" address? But that is very close to the subdomain routing of the component support... . Michael
