On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 10:06 AM, Michael Jakl<[email protected]> wrote: > The smackx-pubsub has special versions of smack and smackx (also > called 3.1.0). It *might* work with the stock libs, yet, the last time > I tried I've had mysterious errors.
Well, that's no good. Can you try again with the stock JARs? if that doesn't work, can you find out what the differences are so that we can keep patch of that. If really needed, I'll upload the custom ones with a different version number. > Yes, currently I simply pass a VM parameter which dynamically loads > the module if it is on the classpath. How does that handle passing a parameter? > I could also look at the Spring integration, but how does Spring > change the need for having both jars on the classpath? With Spring, you would not have a build time dependency from core to pubsub. But, loading using a system property would of course also work. /niklas
