Niklas Gustavsson wrote: > On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 2:57 PM, Bernd Fondermann <[email protected]> > wrote: >> However, wearing my XMPP-shutter-glasses, I like to add that Vysper >> itself would not profit from extending it to parse more XML. Vysper >> needs fast fail, where any XML not supported by XMPP leads to an >> immediate exception. Everything else only generates overhead, lost for >> processing more XMPP stanzas. > > Fully agreed. In fact, I think this requirement is shared by many > other XML-on-the-wire protocols, as things like DTD declarations, > comments and PIs makes very little sense in such protocols. Therefore, > I think we should make this configurable to be able to behave like it > does today.
Configurable at least, and we will see how much runtime-overhead this produces. Bernd
