>>> What about the assertion that new filters only get created to simulate a >>> state machine? >> >> Finally, managed to check-in some of the initial thoughts. >> The transition handler or the computeNext function is still to be out in. > > Sorry. Not sure how that answers my question other than to detail what > you've done and what you're about to do. >
OOPS! :-( I think I am getting old After a discussion we thought that we shall make it possible for user's to choose the way we want Filter transitions That's what the transition handler is :-) Default implementation shall be of next Filter in the chain. User's can plugin their implementations for transition say like a State Machine implementation. Since I couldn't take it to logical conclusion, still working on it :) Also my experience with State machines is limited, so will need a helping hand here (or may be some references :-) ) -- thanks ashish Blog: http://www.ashishpaliwal.com/blog My Photo Galleries: http://www.pbase.com/ashishpaliwal
