There are months i'm thinking the same without daring to say so ... The problem is that 1.x branches have been abandonned long time ago and much people are indeed waiting for the release of this 2.0 how bad would it be to release it for the early adopters with a 'use it at your own risk' warning and invite new comers to wait for a 3.0 preview ? would it be acceptable for the community to say that we won't support it extensively as our efforts will be concentrated on 3.0 ?
Maybe it's the right time to shake the anthill or maybe not ... my 2 cents Cordialement, Regards, -Edouard De Oliveira- ----- Message d'origine ---- De : Emmanuel Lecharny <elecha...@gmail.com> À : dev@mina.apache.org Envoyé le : Lun 1 Mars 2010, 18 h 45 min 02 s Objet : Re: ConnectFuture confusion On 3/1/10 6:30 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote: > > On Mar 1, 2010, at 9:20 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote: > >> On 3/1/10 6:10 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote: >>> >>> On Mar 1, 2010, at 8:04 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote: >>> >>>> On 3/1/10 4:38 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On Feb 26, 2010, at 9:03 AM, Ashish wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> Thoughts ? >>>>>> >>>>>> Unless it breaks the system, i would say lets not loose our sleep over >>>>>> this. >>>>> >>>>> While I share the same opinion about the IoFuture hierarchy as you I have >>>>> the same sentiments as Ashish. >>>> I'm afraid that we might have to fix the issue in 2.0.... Trust me, i'm >>>> not pleased with this ! >>> >>> Fixing a bug is one thing. Reorganizing a code base a few days after an >>> attempted vote on its initial release is another. >> >> I know :/ This is why I created a branch, in a desesperate attempt to get >> rid of all those futures, instead of doing that in trunk. Now, it was the >> end of a long and painful week, chasing many bugs in many places, and I was >> turning in circle. >> >> I *wish* we can fix the bug, without having to rewrite this part. > > Another alternative is to totally abandon 2.x. It was never officially > released. Just leave it as it is and work on the new 2.x I'm also considering this option... -- Regards, Cordialement, Emmanuel Lécharny www.nextury.com
