Why not have asterisk(s) represent allow all? Regards, Sai Pullabhotla
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 4:40 AM, David Latorre (JIRA) <j...@apache.org> wrote: > > [ > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FTPSERVER-349?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12842621#action_12842621 > ] > > David Latorre commented on FTPSERVER-349: > ----------------------------------------- > > Hello Devnull, > > When i first revised your patch I noticed this problem. I considered some > possibilities you haven't mentioned: > -1. In the method that adds the subnets/ips to the WhiteListFilter ( > updateWhitelistFilter(), right?) we can remove the filter from the chain if > we have an empty subnet list. > > This would work but I'm concerned that ftpserver users may want to use > WhiteListFilter when it is not in the chain. > > -2. Explictly check for the address 0.0.0.0/0 and consider it to mean "all > addresses allowed". > > > If we move the WhiteListFilter to MINA-core, it might be worth discussing > there how to signal that "all addresses are allowed". > > > What do you think, Niklas? > > > > > > >> WhiteList >> --------- >> >> Key: FTPSERVER-349 >> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FTPSERVER-349 >> Project: FtpServer >> Issue Type: Improvement >> Components: Server >> Affects Versions: 1.0.3 >> Reporter: DevNull43 >> Priority: Trivial >> Fix For: 1.1.0 >> >> Attachments: WhiteList.txt >> >> >> WhiteList filer >> Restricting access to FTP based on a WhiteList >> BlackList -> Allow all, Deny some. >> WhiteList -> Deny all, Allow some. > > -- > This message is automatically generated by JIRA. > - > You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. > >
