On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 13:21, Niklas Gustavsson <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 5:56 PM, Bernd Fondermann > <[email protected]> wrote: >> Is there some solution we could base consensus on? > > Since it's a question of either explicitly declaring namespaces or > explicitly not doing so (to reduce cluttering if I've understood you > correctly), there seems to be hard to find a common ground. I would > like to propose two different ways forward. Either, get input from the > greater community, this decision is not really down to only us two. > Perhaps as a vote. Or, and this would be my preferred option at this > time, give this change some further time. The change has only been in > trunk for a few days and very limited development has occurred since. > Thus, I'm not sure we have yet evaluated (used in anger) the changes > sufficiently to dismiss them. If you or others still don't find any > value in declaring namespaces and find them annoying then, let's > discuss further or call a vote at that time.
Agreed. This is good. The only thing which nags me is that the current trunk has the xmlns="" issue, my patch makes the problem go away, but it is not a fix. Bernd
