2.0.0M6 + 2.0.0RC1: Win7 performance issue
------------------------------------------

                 Key: DIRMINA-790
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-790
             Project: MINA
          Issue Type: Bug
    Affects Versions: 2.0.0-RC1, 2.0.0-M6
         Environment: WinXP SP3 with disabled Firewall + Virusscanner, Win7 
64bit with disabled Virusscanner and Firewall, Win7 32bit with absolutely no 
virusscanner and with disabled firewall, all Systems with 32bit JRE6U20
Ubuntu Linux 64bit mit JRE6U20 64bit
            Reporter: Alex C.
            Priority: Blocker
         Attachments: MINASocketTransfer.zip

Hi there,

I've written a kind of RMI replacement uses MINA for network communication 
layer that is also able to transfer files very fast (without reflection and 
complex serialisation stuff). One of my customers faced a performance problem 
as soon as the receiving application part is running in Win7.

I tried to create an reproducer: 
First I wrote a small test application using Java IO that simply transfers 
1.000.000 bytes of random data from a client to a server. That's very fast. It 
doesn't matter if I try on localhost, or from WinXP->Win7 oder Win7->WinXP. 
Even Linux->Win7 is fast.

Then I wrote the same kind of application with mina. No additional codec, 
nothing complex. I just transfer 100 IoBuffers with 10.000 bytes each from A to 
B.
If I run the application on WinXP via localhost, it's very fast. <1sec runtime.

If I run client and server in Win7, it's f*cking slow. Takes >1min to complete. 

Please find attached the test application.
Just extract and run:

java -cp MINASocketTransfer.jar;./lib/* minasockettransfer.Client <IP or 
Hostname of Server>
java -cp MINASocketTransfer.jar;./lib/* minasockettransfer.Server

The lib folder contains 2.0.0M6 and 2.0.0RC1. To switch from the one to the 
other version, simple "move" the tailing "_" to exclude the specified lib from 
classpath.
Java-Source files are included in the MINASocketTransfer.jar ...

I tested it with 2.0.0M6 and 2.0.0RC1. It's reproducible with both versions.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to