On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 3:23 AM, Niklas Gustavsson <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 11:31 PM, Sam Ruby <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 5:03 PM, Niklas Gustavsson <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 9:25 PM, Doug Cutting <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> Niklas & the MINA PMC: In this month's report from MINA to the board, you >>>> mentioned that you removed from archive.apache.org past releases that >>>> mistakenly included items under the LGPL. In the future, please do not >>>> remove such releases unless their distribution is in fact illegal. >>>> Including >>>> items under the LGPL in releases is not illegal, just against Apache >>>> policy. >>> >>> We got a backup of the removed releases. So, if I understand >>> correctly, the best option would be to restore these? >> >> No objections here. Beyond that, it is a MINA PMC decision. If I >> were on that PMC, my take is that it would be in the best interest of >> existing users if the releases were still available. > > As seen above, the board has provided feedback the we do not need to > remove the releases which contains the LGPL licensed file. Since I got > a backup, does anyone object to me restoring this? If I do, I'll add a > notice on our download page that M4-M6 contains a LGPL file and users > should be aware.
+1 So do we have another release without these libs? - ashish
