On Sep 27, 2011, at 3:20 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: > On 9/27/11 1:18 PM, Mike Mahoney wrote: >> Hello Everyone, > > Hi. Full disclosure: I don't work on Vysper, I just listen in on the list. > >> We're in the process of embedding Vysper into our product, which is >> going well. One of our requirements is for Vysper to accept the >> suggested resource name provided by a client. I have already made >> the necessary modifications to ResourceRegistry, >> DefaultResourceRegistry, and the classes that use them. Is this >> something the Vysper team would be interested in? We'd be happy to >> provide the patch. > > That would improve compliance with RFC 6120, so I say +1. :) > >> We'd like to implement a maximum resource limit >> as well. > > Does that mean "max length" or "max number of connected resources"?
I was thinking "max number of connected resources", but enforcing the length limit would make sense too.
