[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-885?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13203582#comment-13203582
]
Carusyte commented on DIRMINA-885:
----------------------------------
It seems that this issue is communication pattern dependent. The
AbstractPollingIoProcessor relies on the read channel's return value to
determine whether to close the connection, while in my case, a reply should be
attempted before closing the connection, thus the control of connection is less
dependent on the other side. I am thinking of implementing a more tailored
IoProcessor, which realizes the aforementioned logic and monitors the session
pool, disposing any sessions that has out-lived a user-configurable time.
> session is closed before the server writes back to the client
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DIRMINA-885
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-885
> Project: MINA
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Core
> Affects Versions: 2.0.2
> Environment: win XP, jdk 1.6.0_23
> Reporter: Carusyte
> Priority: Minor
>
> I am using some kind of test tool as client to send arbitrary data, my
> decoder and handler work correctly as expected, but MINA closes the session
> before my encoder is called. As I looked into the source code,
> AbstractPollingIoProcessor seems to schedule a session remove as long as the
> # of bytes read from the channel == -1 (line 673 and line 706). As per the
> documentation of java.nio.channels.ReadableByteChannel.read(ByteBuffer dst),
> this method returns -1 if the channel has reached end-of-stream, but is it
> really necessary to close the session even before the client receive any
> response?
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
