2013/7/26 sebb <[email protected]> > On 26 July 2013 13:02, Guillaume Nodet <[email protected]> wrote: > > See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SSHD-181 > > If that sounds a problem to keep them in scm, I'd rather remove those, as > > they're really just there for reference and I can update those with > pointers > > in the main readme or something similar. > > That would be better. > It's not a good idea to keep copies of 3rd party documents. > They might change. > > > Given, they're not part of the release, I don't think it's an issue, but > I > > can remove > > them and recut if you think it is. > > If they are not needed to build, test or run the application, and the > local files are not referenced from any READMEs etc then that is not a > blocker. >
They're not. > > But they should be removed from SCM before the next release. > Done. > > > Guillaume > > > > 2013/7/26 sebb <[email protected]> > > > >> On 26 July 2013 08:08, Guillaume Nodet <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > Sorry, I need to cancel this vote, as it contains a blocking bug. > >> > See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SSHD-243 > >> > I'll fix it, fix the NOTICE files, do more tests, and recut it asap. > >> > >> What about the docs files that are not in the source release? > >> Is that a deliberate omission? If so, why are they still in SCM? > >> > >> If kept, they probably need to be mentioned in the LICENSE file. > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > ----------------------- > > Guillaume Nodet > > ------------------------ > > Red Hat, Open Source Integration > > > > Email: [email protected] > > Web: http://fusesource.com > > Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ > -- ----------------------- Guillaume Nodet ------------------------ Red Hat, Open Source Integration Email: [email protected] Web: http://fusesource.com Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
