You're right. I missed the fact that FtpReply is being passed in the afterCommand as I was looking at the methods that it calls with just a session and request. Thank you very much for taking the time and helping.
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 10:23 AM, Dave Roberts < [email protected]> wrote: > On 22/10/2013 17:17, Gentian Hila wrote: > > We're not using OSGI container so that should be ok. However, I would > like > > to not use a patched version if possible. First I would like to try to > > submit a ticket for a new feature and hopefully extend and submit a new > > feature to the project if possible. > > Tickets with patches tend to be welcome much more than tickets without. > > > There is a JIRA ticket already for the first approach but no official > > version yet. > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/i#browse/FTPSERVER-401 > > I can see that would be useful, but with the limited resources > already available, I wouldn't expect to see a Minor ticket get fixed > soon, especially if it involved an API change. > > I should point out that I'm just a long-term user of FtpServer and > although I have contributed via patches, I have nothing to do with > the Project Team nor do I speak for them in any capacity. > > Really your best option would be to provide your own Ftplet > implementation without using the DefaultFtplet. This way, you can > use the official 1.0.6 release without change. > >
