I suppose you just tag the same commit hash and drop the branch. Le 28 nov. 2013 23:14, "Jeff MAURY" <[email protected]> a écrit :
> Well branch has been delete (which I don't like). > Can you rename a branch to be a tag with git ? > > Jeff > > > On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 10:27 PM, sebb <[email protected]> wrote: > > > If it should become necessary to mark a branch read-only, I would > > suggest the following: > > > > Rename it as a tag; that's effectively what it has become - tags > > should be immutable. > > or > > Rename it to xxx_READ_ONLY > > > > In each case it would probably be worthwhile to add a README file to > > explain the rationale (and point to the mail thread). > > > > > > On 27 November 2013 12:49, Jeff MAURY <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Done > > > > > > Jeff > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 1:44 PM, Emmanuel Lécharny < > [email protected] > > >wrote: > > > > > >> Le 11/27/13 1:29 PM, Jeff MAURY a écrit : > > >> > Hello, > > >> > > > >> > I've rebased 2.0.8 into 2.0 and pushed it to the server. > > >> > > >> Ok, thanks. > > >> > > >> > Still have to either delete 2.0.8 branch or put it read only (it is > > >> > possible to do it with a hook but it seems it is not possible to > push > > a > > >> > hook) > > >> > > >> Just delete it. It's useless. > > >> > > >> -- > > >> Regards, > > >> Cordialement, > > >> Emmanuel Lécharny > > >> www.iktek.com > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Jeff MAURY > > > > > > > > > "Legacy code" often differs from its suggested alternative by actually > > > working and scaling. > > > - Bjarne Stroustrup > > > > > > http://www.jeffmaury.com > > > http://riadiscuss.jeffmaury.com > > > http://www.twitter.com/jeffmaury > > > > > > -- > Jeff MAURY > > > "Legacy code" often differs from its suggested alternative by actually > working and scaling. > - Bjarne Stroustrup > > http://www.jeffmaury.com > http://riadiscuss.jeffmaury.com > http://www.twitter.com/jeffmaury >
