[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-930?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14122870#comment-14122870
 ] 

Emmanuel Lecharny commented on DIRMINA-930:
-------------------------------------------

Won't be fixed in 2.0

> Problems with ObjectSerializationCodecFactory using MINA in between Java 6 
> and Java 7
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DIRMINA-930
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-930
>             Project: MINA
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Core
>    Affects Versions: 2.0.7
>         Environment: Windows 7, Java 7, Java 6
>            Reporter: Marco Waimer
>            Priority: Critical
>             Fix For: 3.0.0-trunk
>
>         Attachments: MinaClient.java, MinaServer.java, Server6Client7.txt, 
> Server7Client6.txt
>
>
> We use mina with the 
> org.apache.mina.filter.codec.serialization.ObjectSerializationCodecFactory 
> for our communication framework. Using Java 7 on one side (i.e. server) and 
> Java 6 on the other side (i.e. client) leads to problems with the 
> deserialisation, in our case with a java.util.Locale object, which has 
> additional fields in Java 7. See attached stack traces.
> We tracked the problem to 
> org.apache.mina.core.buffer.AbstractIoBuffer.putObject(Object) and 
> org.apache.mina.core.buffer.AbstractIoBuffer.getObject(ClassLoader), since 
> this part is overriding java serialisation and omitting some class 
> information, which will be needed for the deserialisation. 
> Using the attached example the stack traces could easily be reproduced, 
> running one part with Java 7 and the other with Java 6. The MinaServer will 
> simply open a port and the MinaClient will send a java.util.Locale object to 
> that port.
> In MINA 1.1.7 ObjectOutputStream and ObjectInputStream were used without 
> overriding writeClassDescriptor/readClassDescriptor, therefore the problem 
> does not exist there.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to