[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SSHD-436?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14385623#comment-14385623
 ] 

Goldstein Lyor commented on SSHD-436:
-------------------------------------

P.S. please note that due to the difference in KEX code between client and 
server we have to go through an intermediate class...

That being said, I do not have an objection to moving the factory code directly 
to the enum(s) - let me know if you agree, and I will be happy to do so not 
only for the KEX but for all the built-in factories - MAC, signature, etc... Do 
you want it as one big commit or a series of smaller ones (though under one 
SSHD-NNNN issue) ? If so, please apply this patch to the master branch and then 
I will take it from there...

> Use as much as possible common code for client and server KEX
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SSHD-436
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SSHD-436
>             Project: MINA SSHD
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>    Affects Versions: 1.0.0
>            Reporter: Goldstein Lyor
>         Attachments: 
> 0038-SSHD-436-Use-as-much-as-possible-common-code-for-cli.patch, 
> SSHD-436.patch
>
>
> The idea is that the basic KEX mechanism is almost the same for client and 
> server - there are some differences in the messages they send and the way 
> they choose the KEX parameters (_p_, _g_ values). The attached patch contains 
> the following changes:
> * The common code has been moved to _org.apache.sshd.common.kex_
> * The respective _org.apache.sshd.client.kex_ and 
> _org.apache.sshd.server.kex_ packages contain only the *differences*
> * The built-in KEX mechanisms have been encapsulated into an _enum_, and the 
> logic of whether they are supported by default has been attached to each 
> specific enum value
> * The setup of the client/server now uses a *common* initializer in order to 
> avoid code duplication.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to