Thx for all the work you did those past months. I started removing some warnings in the code such as boxing/unboxing, diamonds operator, etc...
I was wondering if we should set up some enforcement around code style and warnings using checkstyle and windbags before doing the 1.0 release, but that's not a big deal. I also saw that some tests are failing... I'm fixing some of those. Could you have a look on your side too ? Otherwise, +1 2015-07-16 6:42 GMT+02:00 Lyor Goldstein <[email protected]>: > As you have probably noticed, SSHD 1.0 has undergone major development - > including features, bug fixes and re-organization of the code in order to > make it more robust, easier to debug, extend, etc... The version seems > stable enough - no major new features planned (at least for 1.0). > Personally, some of the features and bug fixes I have contributed are > driven by bugs or lacking features in the last released version - 0.14.0. > > Please note that there was some major code re-factoring - mainly moving > classes to more "natural" locations and attempting to create a clearer > separation between client, server and common code. This means that code > based on versions pre-1.0 will need some changes - mainly resolving the new > location of the moved class, and in a few instances changing slightly the > parameters or return type. For any IDE this is a 5 min. job at most, so > this should not be an issue (IMO). The idea is to attempt and have a good > structure in version 1.0 so that in future versions such re-factoring will > be rare if any. > >
