GitHub user bkuker opened a pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/pull/33

    Tests & Candidate fix for SSHD-85.

    SSHD-85 is a bug that occurs on Windows where the last few bytes of data 
sent through a port forward can be lost when the server at the far end of the 
port forward sends the data and immediately closes the socket.
    
    An example of this server behavior would be HTTP 1.0 with the Connection: 
close header. The server sends the data, and then closes the socket to indicate 
that it is done sending data. The server does not send a Content-Length header 
or similar. This is a stupid way to do it, all modern http servers do better, 
but there are still old embedded systems that work this way, and it does impact 
my use case.
    
    The test cases include some sleeps on the client end. This seems to be a 
race condition that occurs possibly one time in a hundred or more, but these 
sleeps cause it to happen every single time.
    The test cases include two controls: JSCH as the client
    
    During testing I did verify that the test server did send all data to the 
ssh client by examining the buffers in the ssh client and seeing all of the 
data. I then verified that all of the data was transferred from the ssh client 
to the ssh server by examining the buffers in the sshd server.  The sshd server 
does write all of that data to the socket as far as I can tell, but on Windows 
some still goes missing at the end! I also verified that on Local port forwards 
the error does occur with Apache SSHD as the client, and does NOT occur with 
JSCH as the client. I would like to try that the other way around with Apache 
SSH Client and another server, but the pickings for Java SSH servers are slim, 
and this one is the best!
    
    I am currently trying to understand WHY the fix (basically one line, 
getSocket().shutdownOutput()) fixes the problem. I am submitting this PR now in 
hopes that someone with a better understanding will point out why it is the 
correct fix and accept it. All I can say at the moment is that it works.
    
    Also includes a fix for a test in PortForwardingLoadTest which was failing 
for me before I started investigating. Frankly it looks like it never worked; I 
would guess that there was some copy-paste mistake in the past when it got 
updated to use try-with-resources.
    
    I am ... very motivated to get this fixed so I do not have to maintain my 
own private branch of sshd, so please ask questions, make suggestions, if you 
think I am totally crazy help me prove that I am not!

You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

    $ git pull https://github.com/bkuker/mina-sshd sshd-85

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

    https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/pull/33.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

    This closes #33
    
----
commit e6e400b24fe5d4d6778135e1ae5e38fb8ac3631a
Author: bkuker <[email protected]>
Date:   2017-06-14T12:20:41Z

    Tests for SSHD-85

commit fe92dc673678e66374d2a095a2299b8e60425c98
Author: bkuker <[email protected]>
Date:   2017-06-20T15:01:56Z

    The Fix?

commit 5842c850485835a98385937df7bb74b0ca4c4889
Author: bkuker <[email protected]>
Date:   2017-06-22T13:13:57Z

    This test failed before my changes. It made no sense as it was.

----


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at [email protected] or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Reply via email to