Le 06/07/2018 à 16:29, Jonathan Valliere a écrit :
> Any objections to setting up a 2.X branch which serves as the master then
> create the explicit numerical branches when releases are done?  The 2.0
> used to be the master but now there is 2.1.  Just looking to make it easier
> to understand.

No objection.

We should rename the 3.0 branch to MINA-future, and the 2.1 branch to 3.X.

The current 2.0 branch could be renamed 2.X.

-- 
Emmanuel Lecharny

Symas.com
directory.apache.org

Attachment: pEpkey.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys

Reply via email to