[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SSHD-854?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16671949#comment-16671949
]
Goldstein Lyor commented on SSHD-854:
-------------------------------------
{quote}
It's worth noting that the changes you've made to use session attributes
instead of a map to store/retrieve the cached value, would solve the problem
I'm describing. When do you think we can expect those changes to be released?
{quote}
I believe when we release 2.2 - some time in Q1 2019 (unless there is an urgent
need to release before that)
> Massive object graph in NioSocketSession
> ----------------------------------------
>
> Key: SSHD-854
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SSHD-854
> Project: MINA SSHD
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: jpalacios
> Priority: Major
>
> I'm looking at a heap dump from one of our customers where the retained heap
> size for some {{NioSocketSession}} instances is almost 1GB.
> From the looks of the dump MINA has created a massive object graph where:
> {code}
> NioSocketSession -> SelectionKeyImpl -> EpollSelectorImpl -> HashMap ->
> SelectionKeyImpl -> NioSocketSession -> ...
> {code}
> From the looks of the obeject IDs these are not loops
> Each individual object is not large by itself but at the top of the graph the
> accumulated retained size is enough to produce an OOME
> Could you help me understand how MINA can produce such a massive object
> graph? Should MINA apply any defense mechanism to prevent this??
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
