gnodet commented on a change in pull request #123:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/pull/123#discussion_r412196892



##########
File path: 
sshd-core/src/main/java/org/apache/sshd/common/session/helpers/AbstractSession.java
##########
@@ -954,7 +954,9 @@ protected IoWriteFuture doWritePacket(Buffer buffer) throws 
IOException {
         synchronized (encodeLock) {
             Buffer packet = resolveOutputPacket(buffer);
             IoSession networkSession = getIoSession();
-            return networkSession.writePacket(packet);
+            IoWriteFuture future = networkSession.writePacket(packet);
+            buffer.rpos(buffer.wpos());
+            return future;

Review comment:
       Ok, so the problem is in the assumptions about the `writePacket`.  In 
the case of the nio2 implementation, it always wrap the data into a different 
buffer. Let me look a bit more into it.




----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to