David Ostrovsky created SSHD-1030: ------------------------------------- Summary: Provide support for NoFileSystemFactoryProvider Key: SSHD-1030 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SSHD-1030 Project: MINA SSHD Issue Type: New Feature Affects Versions: 2.5.1 Reporter: David Ostrovsky
Prior to 2.5.0 release Gerrit was using this was to initialize \{{FileSystemFactoryProvider}}: {code:java} private void initFileSystemFactory() { setFileSystemFactory( session -> new FileSystem() { @Override public void close() throws IOException {} @Override public Iterable<FileStore> getFileStores() { return null; } @Override public Path getPath(String arg0, String... arg1) { return null; } @Override public PathMatcher getPathMatcher(String arg0) { return null; } @Override public Iterable<Path> getRootDirectories() { return null; } @Override public String getSeparator() { return null; } @Override public UserPrincipalLookupService getUserPrincipalLookupService() { return null; } @Override public boolean isOpen() { return false; } @Override public boolean isReadOnly() { return false; } @Override public WatchService newWatchService() throws IOException { return null; } @Override public FileSystemProvider provider() { return null; } @Override public Set<String> supportedFileAttributeViews() { return null; } }); } {code} After the migration to release 2.5.1 it doesn't compile any more, because the {{FileSystemFactory}} factory is not FunctionalInterface any more. We could something like this: {code:java} private void initFileSystemFactory() { setFileSystemFactory(NativeFileSystemFactory.INSTANCE); } {code} But given that we are not using sftp, it could be even safer to just say: {code:java} private void noFileSystemFactory() { setFileSystemFactory(NoFileSystemFactory.INSTANCE); } {code} -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@mina.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@mina.apache.org