jazzm0 opened a new issue, #686:
URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/686

   ### Version
   
   2.2.0->2.15.0
   
   ### Bug description
   
   Hi, I'm using this project in my android app since a couple of years, and 
I've noticed a significant performance degradation over time. I tested various 
versions, as I initially thought the different phones I've used caused the 
performance degradation. Since users reported this issue as well, I tested all 
versions under the same conditions from 2.2.0 till 2.15.0. I noticed 
significant differences. I only tested with large files (800+ MB since that was 
easier to measure. Is there any configuration on server side which I can use to 
improve performance. In my latest release  I try to use compression, and a 
dedicated thread pool, but it doesn't seem to have a significant impact on the 
overall performance in my case. 
   
   Thanks and Kind Regards
   
   
   ### Actual behavior
   
   below the measruements:
   
   2.2.0 -> 1.6 Mb/s
   2.4.0 -> 1.4 Mb/s
   2.5.0 -> 1.4 Mb/s
   2.7.0 -> 1.6 Mb/s
   2.8.0 -> 1.7 Mb/s
   2.9.0 -> 1.7 Mb/s
   2.10.0 -> 1.0 Mb/s
   2.11.0 -> 1.1 Mb/s
   2.12.0 -> 0.7 Mb/s
   2.13.0 -> 0.96 Mb/s
   2.14.0 -> 1.1 Mb/s
   2.15.0 -> 1.1 Mb/s
   
   ### Expected behavior
   
   this is how I use the server code
   
   
https://github.com/jazzm0/ssh-daemon/blob/2.1.24/app/src/main/java/com/sshdaemon/sshd/SshDaemon.java#L118
   
   ### Relevant log output
   
   ```Shell
   
   ```
   
   ### Other information
   
   _No response_


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@mina.apache.org.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@mina.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@mina.apache.org

Reply via email to