alexandrejbr commented on issue #928: URL: https://github.com/apache/mina-sshd/issues/928#issuecomment-6190236132
@tomaswolf so are you saying you'd implement ML-KEM yourself and we could try to collaborate in multiple PRs for ML-DSA? What do you think of being permissive with regards to the ML-DSA key format? I would say the important part is interoperability and I guess that's why it's not terrible that Fluhrer drafts leaves things open. That's the approach I believe we will be taking in Erlang/OTP. Having ML-DSA just in 3.0 would be totally fine from my perspective. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
