Mitsutaka Amano wrote: > Dear Dmitri, > > Maybe It should answer by Prajwal :-) But I do. > First, we can use some images for Fedora base. Currently It can't be run. > > If you run MIC on Ubuntu, you can use apt and deb packages and moblin, ubuntu > repository. > And If you run MIC on Fedora, you can use yum and rpm packages and fedora > repository. >
OK, this answers my question. Thank you for the explanation. Regards, Dmitri > Perhaps we can't prepare moblin RPM packages and moblin yum repository. > > If you upgrade moblin 2.0 infrastructure, you can also use deb packages and > apt. > > Thanks, > > ======================================== > Mitsutaka Amano > MIRACLE LINUX CORPORATION > ======================================== > > > > Dmitri Vorobiev wrote: >> Mitsutaka Amano wrote: >> >>> Hi Ian, >>> >>> I'm a MIC commiter. We will implement the RPM full support. >>> So I thought that moblin 2.0 will take a RPM support. >>> >>> Maybe we might be mistaken for this announce. >>> I think that it's not switching and It's supporting. >>> >> Dear Mitsutaka-san, >> >> Will the change imply that the binary packages be taken in the future from >> Fedora rather than Ubuntu? I mean statistically, will Ubuntu stay as the >> primary source of packages or not? >> >> Thanks, >> Dmitri >> >> >> _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] https://www.moblin.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
