Alright, build-helper-maven-plugin stays at MOJO. I will realease it.
Thanks
-Dan
On 2/7/06, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This is a good point. I think that we can keep it here.
The main thing I was interested in is the artifact attachment, but IMO
that is something that should be made easier in a later version of Maven.
- Brett
jerome lacoste wrote:
> On 1/30/06, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I'm plenty confused myself. I'd have liked to hear from more people, but
>> I think at this point I'll take the proposal to the Maven lists to see
>> if I can kick the discussion off a bit more.
>
> I just have a question, althought I am probably rather late to the
> debate: this plugin seems to be rather helpful when you do not
> completely follow the maven way of setting up your build.
>
> Promoting it to apache makes it sound like other ways are more
> accepted than before. Although I am all in favor of giving people
> tools to solve their issues, I am just wondering if something hasn't
> changed there. It's maybe just a feeling...
>
> Finally, if adding a source or a test-source or attach an artifact
> becomes an accepted concept, I tend to wonder why it doesn't become
> part of the pom itself. I find strange that one needs to add 20 lines
> of XML when the real content is just one line.
>
> So is there some plan to modify the pom in 2.1 to have these features?
> If yes, then -1 to include the plugin on apache. If not, why not? :)
>
>
> With regard to names, do we plan to gather under this plugin other
> goals that fit this little border line use cases? If so, what about a
> name that integrates this concept? xbuild (x for eXtended)?
>
> Jerome
>
