Thanks for taking care of this Kaare.
About the release we could make an alpha, although i think it's better
to have the bugs fixed and go for the 1.0 final.
On 2/10/06, Carlos Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2/10/06, Kaare Nilsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 10/02/06, Carlos Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > - mojos run in compile and test-compile phase, which mean that
> > > standard java compiler may run before it, thus failing in some cases
> > > (I believe is when a test class extends a main class already weaved).
> > > Don't know if compiler can be removed from aspectj mojo or aspectj
> > > should be moved to plexus compiler, if not it has to run in the
> > > process-sources and process-test-sources phase.
> >
> > The problem by putting it in the process sources phase is that the ajc
> > compiler does nothing to the sourcefiles, but only to the classfiles,
> > so if it is to work having it in the process sources phase, I need to
> > know if a ajc compile would make the std java compiler to do nothing
> > to that class afterwards and then overwrite any modifications ajc does
> > to the class.
>
>
> Actually it does, it compiles the sources, which can be seen as
> "process" them. It doesn't require classes to be compiled.
>
> I'll create jira issues to structure this conversation a bit.
>
--
I could give you my word as a Spaniard.
No good. I've known too many Spaniards.
-- The Princess Bride
