On Thu, 2006-02-16 at 13:54 -0600, Jesse McConnell wrote: > actually this would probably be 2.0 release to mirror the way sablecc > and javacc released
+1 for release, -1 for releasing it as 2.0 if this is the first release. The only reason for starting Mojos at 2.0 is if there was an existing Maven plugin. That way we can say that we're breaking stuff (because Maven 1 plugins can't be used in Maven 2). If that is the case I'm +1 for 2.0 aswell. I guess this explanation should be put on [1] aswell. [1]: http://mojo.codehaus.org/development/process.html -- Trygve
