I agree, many products with studio in the name, but shouldn't be too many with the prefix csharp in the group name? :-)
How about vstudio? Chris -----Original Message----- From: Trygve Laugstøl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 14 February 2006 12:09 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [mojo-dev] CSharp Mojo - Is this right for coding convention? On Tue, 2006-02-14 at 11:41 +0000, Stevenson, Chris wrote: > Hello All, > > So I think I've convinced myself for now that the best place for the > CSharp stuff is the mojo project. I think being in m2 core may be too > constrictive to development. > > Just to check, I'm moving all my code to be in the mojos package but > as I have multiple plugins inside my project I'm hoping to have code > in this manner: > > packages: > > org.codehaus.mojo.csharp (root mojo package) > > org.codehaus.mojo.csharp.studio (plugin) > org.codehaus.mojo.csharp.dotnetassembly (plugin) > org.codehaus.mojo.csharp.nunit (plugin) > > etc... > > and the plugin names should be the opposite of the m2 core convention: > > studio-maven-plugin This should probably be called visual-studio-maven-plugin or msvs-maven-plugin as there are lots products with "studio" in their names. -- Trygve -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The information contained herein is confidential and is intended solely for the addressee. Access by any other party is unauthorised without the express written permission of the sender. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender either via the company switchboard on +44 (0)20 7623 8000, or via e-mail return. If you have received this e-mail in error or wish to read our e-mail disclaimer statement and monitoring policy, please refer to http://www.drkw.com/disc/email/ or contact the sender. 3167 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
