On Mon, 2006-03-06 at 06:34 +1100, Brett Porter wrote: > Raphaël Piéroni wrote: > >> That sounds like maven-archetype-mojo, that creates a mojo. > >> > >> Why don't we just have a whole bunch of subprojects, and then categorise > >> them on the front page? > >> > > Why do the maven repository was refactored into components, plugins, > > archetypes ? ;) > > I'm not saying anything about the svn structure. I think calling > something publically the "Mojo Archetype subproject" is undesirable. > > I'd be fine with splitting mojo into /plugins/, /archetypes/, > /components/ and /sandbox/ too.
Actually, I like this layout a whole lot. It would be just like Maven's Apache repository which seem to work just great. I don't have time for it right now, but I'd be +1 for someone to go ahead and move stuff around in the repository. -- Trygve
