retracted since Jeff fixed it. Now +1
Brett Porter wrote: > Jeff, > > I'm tending -1 only on the basis that it is using openejb:jaxb2.0 > dependencies, which I thought were going to be removed from the > repository. I don't want that to be something permanent. > > Can they be updated to a proper group ID? > > Thanks, > Brett > > Jeff Genender wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I have received some private emails from folks who are using the JAXB >> 2.0 plugin and would like to have it released. >> >> We also have an open source project that use the JAXB 2.0 plugin >> (OpenEJB3) and the new Geronimo specs for Java EE5 will likely use it as >> well. >> >> I have filled in the site doc and I feel its ready for release. So I >> would like to vote on releasing it as 1.0. >> >> [ ] +1 - Good to release >> [ ] +0 - Don't realy care >> [ ] -1 - I am against its release because _______________ >> >> I will start with a +1. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Jeff >> >
