Yes...that was with my Apache hat on ;-)  Sometimes I get confused.

- Jeff

Wayne Fay wrote:
> Well if his plugin simply calls the Sun jars, and does not include
> them, then it would be up to the Maven User as to whether or not they
> could comply with the Sun license and thus use the Jaxb1 plugin. This
> jaxb1 pom would need to include those Sun jars as dependencies and
> then it would be up to the user to go download them from Sun directly
> and install manually into their local or corporate repo.
> 
> So I don't see this as any good reason to keep this plugin off the
> Codehaus site etc. ;-)
> 
> Wayne
> 
> 
> On 4/14/06, Jeff Genender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Whats the licensing on the Sun jars for 1.0?  That may be a slight problem.
>>
>> I know they changed them to CDDL for 2.0.
>>
>> Jeff
>>
>> Kostis Anagnostopoulos wrote:
>>> Hi to all,
>>>
>>> I have made a Maven2 plugin for JAXB 1.0 compile based on the JAXB 2.0
>>> plugin, hosted on mojo.codehaus.org.
>>>
>>> If there is interest (i.e. requirement for JAXB under 1.4 java), i can
>>> upload the code to mojo.codehaus.org.
>>>
>>> Here are the nomenclature i intend to use:
>>>     groupId: org.codehaus.mojo
>>>     artifactId: jaxb1-maven2-plugin
>>>     url: http://mojo.codehaus.org/jaxb1-maven2-plugin/
>>>
>>> I can give more details about the plugin if required, feel free to ask
>>> me.  Me myself have some question about i.e, the proper artifact id,
>>> and such.
>>>
>>> I have not write access to svn repository so i will need direction on
>>> how to accomplish such a task, if desired.
>>>
>>>     Anagnostopoulos Kostis

Reply via email to