On 4/21/06, Kaare Nilsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi. > > The situation is that I got a patch for the aspectj plugin > http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MOJO-327 and after a little discussion > with the patch supplier I added it into the codebase, but I did not > expose it as an executable goal in the plugin. > Well now, after some while I have not heard anymore about from the > patch writer, and the promised testcases, and documentation have not > arrived. > > Myself I have not tested it closely, and now face three alternatives > 1) Try to get hold of the patch supplier, and ask one(or more) time > for testcases, and documentation. > 2) Try to figure out what it does, and write the testcases and doc myself > 3) Delete the class in svn > > My gut-feeling is alternative 3. > > WDYT ?
It's your baby :) I would go for maybe 1 with a 7 days notice then 3. Maybe someone will step up to do 2 if your message is public? Personally, when I receive contributions without tests, I try not putting them in... Accepting them in means accepting that you will have to maintain them afterwards. Jerome
