Ok, but there were definitely problems aside from that movement hack
- so do we need to nuke 2.1 from the repository?
- Brett
On 25/02/2007, at 12:59 AM, Joakim Erdfelt wrote:
I'm working on the cobertura side to fix the cobertura.ser
relocation bug.
I have already commit'd a set of patches that correct this situation.
I'd love to get a SNAPSHOT repo up for cobertura, but there's very
little interest in that on the cobertura side. ;-/
I believe that the new cobertura codebase + rollback of the
cobertura.ser movement hack on the plugin side is the answer.
- Joakim
Brett Porter wrote:
Hi Joakim,
I went to investigate this. The only change I could find relevant to
MCOBERTURA-57 was r2744 (though I'm guessing because they weren't
recorded in the comment logs). I rolled this back, but still had
problems. I was testing it on Proficio from Better Builds With Maven.
cobertura:check will pass after rolling it back - so that rev
definitely causes problems.
But I still get a lot of exceptions (which are now warnings
instead of
failures which I don't think should be the case: r2748), and the
reported % is always 10% (and branch coverage is N/A). The executed
lines show up with counts, but the missed ones are not shown as
anything. It looks like maybe the conversion to cobertura 1.8 has
some
problems itself.
How do you think we should progress?
- Brett
On 13/01/2007, at 11:55 AM, Joakim Erdfelt wrote:
It seems to stem from 1 jira -
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MCOBERTURA-57
I missed the vote against 2.1, I would have voted -1 just because
of the
above jira.
BTW, I field about 3 direct emails about cobertura-maven-plugin
2.1 a
day now. I recommend that to all people to downgrade to 2.0 for the
time being.
We can probably revert MCOBERTURA-57 and release 2.1.1 as a short
term fix.
The long term fix for MCOBERTURA-57 has recently been checked in
at the
cobertura (non-plugin) subversion at sourceforge.net
- Joakim Erdfelt
Brett Porter wrote:
I'm seeing complaints that 2.1 doesn't work. Did all those that
voted
test it? Are these isolated incidents, or is there something
fundamentally wrong with the release?
On 12/12/2006, at 1:33 AM, Fabrizio Giustina wrote:
Hi,
I would like to release the cobertura-maven-plugin: there have
been
few changes since the last release but those changes could be
really
useful to users, so I don't want to delay a release any further.
The list of changes is at:
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MCOBERTURA?
report=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.project:roadmap-panel
my +1
fabrizio
------------------------------------------------------------------
---
To unsubscribe from this list please visit:
http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
-------------------------------------------------------------------
--
To unsubscribe from this list please visit:
http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
--------------------------------------------------------------------
-
To unsubscribe from this list please visit:
http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list please visit:
http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list please visit:
http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list please visit:
http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
