I've now tried out both... the google one actually works a bit better so far and they did manage to come up with something pretty good once you actually get it to work... it still need a lot of work to be a mainstream plugin (missing some key features).
I do think the google folks could use some input from the maven guru's at Codehaus as they do things a bit "funny". Not sure I can pin one thing down off the top of my head, but I got the "unfinished" feeling when using it that I usually don't get from codehaus plugins (even the sandbox plugins). Frankly I think that what this is really going to take, is a rewrite of Google's tool wrapper (which should be able to happen without causing to much in the way of upgrade headaches) to make it more configurable. - Brill Pappin On 3/15/07, kristian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Kostis, I did have a look at the other project and honestly I do not know what I should do or can do there. my intension with codehaus was to give something back from where I received a lot and I do not have the same feelings towards the google camp. just before you posted that message into the jira ticket, I wanted to post something like, whether it would help to get that plugin into the sandbox if I add some tests to it. for me it is quite clear that I would help to maintain the codehaus plugin, but if it does not become a codehaus plugin, I just will use mine, since it works well enough for my needs. this is my second plugin I wrote and I learned a lot about plexus, maven etc writing it. so whatever the decision will be, I am happy with that decision. but I am not the one who decides things here. with regards Kristian On 3/15/07, Kostis Anagnostopoulos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Kristian, > > There is another maven2 gwt-plugin, this one coming from the Google camp: > http://code.google.com/p/gwt-maven/ > Any ideas for avoiding the double effort? > > Also, are there any plans to have this plugin added to mojo sandbox? > > --- > I have also cross-posted a similar message to the Google-groups: > http://groups.google.com/group/gwt-maven/browse_thread/thread/7d3f75a74bf48701/189b8e4a4ab8890e?lnk=st&q=gwt-maven&rnum=9#189b8e4a4ab8890e > > Regards, > Kostis > > > On 1/31/07, kristian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > hallo Matthew, > > > > here are a few words about the archetypes. maybe you have to adjust > > the version to what you got from the svn. I do appreciate comments on > > them. > > > > gwt-simple-archetype > > =============== > > > > this creates something similar to the GWT-tool 'applicationCreator', > > but in a mavenized way. > > the created pom.xml has the gwt-plugin, maven-jetty-plugin and the > > maven-war-plugin configured. so mvn jetty:run starts an embedded > > servlet container and mvn package will pack a ready to deploy > > war-file. > > > > mvn archetype:create \ > > -DgroupId=sample.group.id \ > > -DartifactId=simple-artifact-id \ > > -Dversion=1.0-SNAPSHOT \ > > -DpackageName=sample.group.id \ > > -DarchetypeGroupId=de.saumya.mojo \ > > -DarchetypeArtifactId=gwt-simple-archetype \ > > -DarchetypeVersion=1.4-SNAPSHOT > > > > gwt-module-archetype > > ================ > > > > that just setups a frame for GWT library, i.e. the GWT-module has no > > EntryPoint and the > > pom.xml is configured to attach the sources on the install goal > > > > mvn archetype:create \ > > -DgroupId=sample.group.id \ > > -DartifactId=module-artifact-id \ > > -Dversion=1.0-SNAPSHOT \ > > -DpackageName=sample.group.id \ > > -DarchetypeGroupId=de.saumya.mojo \ > > -DarchetypeArtifactId=gwt-module-archetype \ > > -DarchetypeVersion=1.4-SNAPSHOT > > > > gwt-archetype > > ========== > > > > this is an extension to the gwt-simple-archetype which included an > > remote-service and its servlet in the sample application. again mvn > > jetty:run starts the embedded servlet container with the application > > and mvn package does pack the war-file. > > > > mvn archetype:create \ > > -DgroupId=sample.group.id \ > > -DartifactId=artifact-id \ > > -Dversion=1.0-SNAPSHOT \ > > -DpackageName=sample.group.id \ > > -DarchetypeGroupId=de.saumya.mojo \ > > -DarchetypeArtifactId=gwt-archetype \ > > -DarchetypeVersion=1.4-SNAPSHOT > > > > hope that clarifies a bit. > > > > Kristian > > > > On 1/31/07, J. Matthew Pryor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > kristian, > > > > > > Can you please explain a little more what the archetypes do and why > > > they are different? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Matthew > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe from this list please visit: > > > > > > http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Kristian Meier & Saumya Sharma-Meier > > Sahyadri School (Krishnamurti Foundation India), > > Tiwai Hill, > > Rajgurunagar, Pune-410513 > > Maharashtra, INDIA > > > > tel: +91 (2135) 321313 > > pgp: http://pgpkeys.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x61DB690F > > my home: http://maps.google.com/maps?hl=en&ie=UTF8&z=18&ll=18.984342,73.772416&spn=0.00209,0.004731&t=k&om=1&mid=1156683744 > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe from this list please visit: > > > > http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from this list please visit: > > http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email > > -- Kristian Meier & Saumya Sharma-Meier Sahyadri School (Krishnamurti Foundation India), Tiwai Hill, Rajgurunagar, Pune-410513 Maharashtra, INDIA tel: +91 (2135) 321313 pgp: http://pgpkeys.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x61DB690F my home: http://maps.google.com/maps?hl=en&ie=UTF8&z=18&ll=18.984342,73.772416&spn=0.00209,0.004731&t=k&om=1&mid=1156683744 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list please visit: http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list please visit: http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
