Do we have a requirement that all plugins must be embedded IDE friendly?
-D On 7/18/07, Milos Kleint <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-1 (or rather -0.5) on the plugin concept in general. It makes maven project embedding in IDE more complicated and unpredictable, possibly requiring to run a maven build to get the correct effective pom. Milos On 7/17/07, Kris Bravo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > +0 not using it either... > > On Tue, 2007-07-17 at 00:42 -0400, Zarar Siddiqi wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I'm getting quite a number of emails from people who want this plugin > > released. It's been out for a while now and has been pretty stable. I > > think it's time for it to be released and would like to have a vote on > > it. > > > > Here's the JIRA: > > http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MOJO-535 > > > > The blog where you'll find some documentation (there's also docs if > > you do mvn site) > > http://arsenalist.com/2007/02/07/maven-properties-plugin-download/ > > > > It's currently in the Sandbox: > > http://snapshots.repository.codehaus.org/org/codehaus/mojo/properties-maven-plugin/ > > > > Thank you, > > Zarar Siddiqi > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from this list please visit: > > http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list please visit: http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
