I'm +1 for moving it (obviously, I guess).
-john
On Sep 7, 2007, at 7:49 PM, Brian E. Fox wrote:
The Maven PMC recently voted on the maven dev list to assume
responsibility for the shade plugin code. It’s up to this group if
that transfer results in a fork or a source move.
Vote is open for 72hrs.
Please vote:
[ ] Move the code to Apache and remove it from the mojo svn
[ ] Leave the source in the mojo svn
My vote:
[x ] Move the code to Apache and remove it from the mojo svn
I believe it will be less confusing to have only one copy of the
source and not to fork it.
---
John Casey
Committer and PMC Member, Apache Maven
mail: jdcasey at commonjava dot org
blog: http://www.ejlife.net/blogs/john
