Personally I'd recommend not linking against the 3.0.1 build. There
are problems with this release due to refactoring. It will require you
add the 2.7.7 antlr libraries to your build dependencies on any
projects using it. This is because it uses classes from the old code.
Plus 3.1 will be out shortly.
If you do want to link against 3.0.1, here's my snippet of the other
two new dependencies you will require:
<!-- these dependencies should not be required, there is a bug in the antlr
3.0.1 jar file that makes it rely on the previous version -->
<dependency>
<groupId>antlr</groupId>
<artifactId>antlr</artifactId>
<version>2.7.7</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.antlr</groupId>
<artifactId>stringtemplate</artifactId>
<version>3.0</version>
</dependency>
Kenny
On 10/16/07, Putrycz, Erik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Any chances you could link to ANTLR 3.0.1 instead of the 3.0?
>
> Erik.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Holroyd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2007 5:36 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [mojo-dev] [VOTE] Release antlr3-maven-plugin 1.0-beta-1
>
> I'd like to make the first release of the ANTLRv3 plugin since moving
> from http://maven.badgers-in-foil.co.uk/sites/maven-antlr3-plugin/
>
> There are currently no open JIRA issues, and I've given it a docck.
>
> I've uploaded the new site here, if anyone wants to check,
>
> http://codehaus.org/~dholroyd/sites/antlr3-maven-plugin/
>
>
> ta,
> dave
>
> --
> http://david.holroyd.me.uk/
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this list please visit:
>
> http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this list please visit:
>
> http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list please visit:
http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
